Charting The Ecliptic ANTIKYTHERA MECHANISM


Machine d’Anticythère

Machine Anticythére

Français : Fragment principal de la machine d’Anticythère. Le mécanisme consiste en un système complexe de 32 roues et plaques portant des inscriptions relatives aux signes du zodiaque et aux mois. L’étude des fragments suggère qu’il s’agissait d’une sorte d’astrolabe utilisée pour la navigation maritime. L’interprétation désormais généralement acceptée remonte aux études du professeur Derek de Solla Price, qui fut le premier à suggérer que le mécanisme est une machine à calculer le calendrier solaire et lunaire, c’est-à-dire une machine ingénieuse pour déterminer le temps sur la base des mouvements du soleil et de la lune, leur relation (éclipses) et les mouvements des autres étoiles et des planètes connues à cette époque. Le mécanisme fut probablement construit par un mécanicien ingénieux de l’école de Poséidonios à Rhodes. Cicéron, qui visita l’île en 79/78 a. C. rapporte que de tels engins étaient en effet conçus par le philosophe stoïcien Poséidonios d’Apamée. La conception du mécanisme d’Anticythère paraît suivre la tradition du planétarium d’Archimède, et peut être reliée aux cadrans solaires. Son mode opératoire est basé sur l’utilisation de roues dentées. La machine est datée de 89 a. C. environ et provient de l’épave trouvée au large de l’île d’Anticythère. Musée archéologique national, Athènes, n°15987.

English: Main Antikythera mechanism fragment. The mechanism consists of a complex system of 32 wheels and plates with inscriptions relating to the signs of the zodiac and the months. The study of the fragments suggests that this was a kind of astrolabe used for marine navigation. The interpretation now generally accepted dates back to studies by Professor Derek de Solla Price, who was the first to suggest that the mechanism is a machine to calculate the solar and lunar calendar, that is to say, an ingenious machine to determine the time based on the movements of the sun and moon, their relationship (eclipses) and the movements of other stars and planets known at that time. The mechanism was probably built by an ingenious mechanic school Posidonius in Rhodes. Cicero, who visited the island in 79/78 B.C. reported that such devices were indeed designed by the Stoic philosopher Posidonius of Apamea. The design of the Antikythera mechanism appears to follow the tradition of Archimedes’ planetarium, and may be related to sundials. His modus operandi is based on the use of gears. The machine is dated around 89 B.C. and comes from the wreck found off the island of Antikythera. National Archaeological Museum, Athens, No. 15987.

The Following Excerpted From Wikipediathe Free Encyclopedia:

ANTIKYTHERA MECHANISM_______________                  _

The Antikythera mechanism ( /ˌæntɨkɨˈθɪərə/ ant-i-ki-theer-ə or /ˌæntɨˈkɪθərə/ ant-i-kith-ə-rə) is an ancient mechanical computer designed to calculate astronomical positions. It was recovered in 1900–1901 from the Antikythera wreck. Its significance and complexity were not understood until decades later. Its time of construction is now estimated between 150 and 100 BC.  Technological artifacts of similar complexity and workmanship did not reappear in Europe until the 14th century, when mechanical astronomical clocks were built in Europe.
Jacques-Yves Cousteau visited the wreck for the last time in 1978, but found no additional remains of the Antikythera mechanism. Professor Michael Edmunds of Cardiff University who led the most recent study of the mechanism said: “This device is just extraordinary, the only thing of its kind. The design is beautiful, the astronomy is exactly right. The way the mechanics are designed just makes your jaw drop. Whoever has done this has done it extremely carefully … in terms of historic and scarcity value, I have to regard this mechanism as being more valuable than the Mona Lisa.”
The device is displayed at the National Archaeological Museum of Athens, accompanied by a reconstruction made and donated to the museum by Derek de Solla Price. Other reconstructions are on display at the American Computer Museum in Bozeman, Montana, the Children’s Museum of Manhattan in New York, and in Kassel, Germany.

ORIGINS__________________________________________

Antikythera Wreck

The mechanism is the oldest known complex scientific calculator. It contains many gears, and is sometimes called the first known analog computer,[9] although its flawless manufacturing suggests that it may have had a number of undiscovered predecessors[10] during the Hellenistic Period. It appears to be constructed upon theories of astronomy and mathematics developed by Greek astronomers and it is estimated that it was made around 150-100 BC.
Consensus among scholars is that the mechanism itself was made in the Greek-speaking world. All the instructions of the mechanism are written in Koine Greek.[8] One hypothesis is that the device was constructed at an academy founded by the Stoic philosopher Posidonius on the Greek island of Rhodes, which at the time was known as a center of astronomy and mechanical engineering, and that perhaps the astronomer Hipparchus was the engineer who designed it since it contains a lunar mechanism which uses Hipparchus’s theory for the motion of the Moon. However, the most recent findings of The Antikythera Mechanism Research Project, as published in the July 31, 2008, edition of Nature alternatively suggest that the concept for the mechanism originated in the colonies of Corinth, which might imply a connection with Archimedes.

It was discovered in a shipwreck off Point Glyphadia on the Greek island of Antikythera. The wreck had been discovered in October 1900 and divers had retrieved numerous artifacts, most of them works of art, which had been transferred to the National Museum of Archaeology for storage. On 17 May 1902, archaeologist Valerios Stais was examining the finds and noticed that one of the pieces of rock had a gear wheel embedded in it. Stais initially believed it was an astronomical clock, but most scholars considered the device an anachronism, too complex to have been constructed during the same period as the other pieces that had been discovered. However, investigations into the object were soon dropped until English physicist Derek J. de Solla Price took an interest in it in 1951.

The circumstances under which it came to be on the cargo ship are unknown. Investigators have suggested that the ship could have been carrying it to Rome, together with other treasure looted from the island to support a triumphal parade being staged by Julius Caesar.

FUNCTION_________________________________________

Schematic of the Artifact's Mechanism

The device is remarkable for the level of miniaturization and for the complexity of its parts, which is comparable to that of 19th-century clocks. It has more than 30 gears, although Michael Wright (see below) has suggested as many as 72 gears, with teeth formed through equilateral triangles. When a date was entered via a crank (now lost), the mechanism calculated the position of the Sun and Moon or other astronomical information such as the locations of planets. Since the purpose was to position astronomical bodies with respect to the celestial sphere, with reference to the observer’s position on the surface of the Earth, the device was based on the geocentric model.

                                                                                                  Antikythera Machine Model 

Front Panel of a 2007 Model

A 2007 MODEL

There is reference in the inscriptions for the planets Mars and Venus, and it would have certainly been within the capabilities of the maker of this mechanism to include gearing to show their positions. There is some speculation that the mechanism may have had indicators for all the five planets known to the Greeks. None of the gearing for such planetary mechanisms survives, except for one gear otherwise unaccounted for.

Finally, the front dial includes a parapegma, a precursor to the modern day almanac, which was used to mark the rising and setting of specific stars. Each star is thought to be identified by Greek characters which cross reference details inscribed on the mechanism.

The upper back dial is in the form of a spiral, with 47 divisions per turn, displaying the 235 months of the 19-year Metonic cycle. This cycle is important in fixing calendars.

The lower back dial is also in the form of a spiral, with 223 divisions showing the saros; it also has a smaller subsidiary dial which displays the 54 year “triple saros” or exeligmos. (The saros, discovered by the Chaldeans, is a period of approximately 18 years 11 days 8 hours—the length of time between occurrences of a particular eclipse.)
The Antikythera Mechanism Research Project, with experts from Britain, Greece and the United States, detected in July 2008 the word “Olympia” on a bronze dial thought to display the 76-year Callippic cycle, as well as the names of other games in ancient Greece, and probably used to track dates of the ancient Olympic Games. According to BBC news:

⠀⠀The four sectors of the dial are inscribed with a year number and two  ⠀⠀Panhellenic Games: the “crown” games of Isthmia, Olympia, Nemea, and ⠀⠀Pythia; and two lesser games:  Naa (held at Dodona) and a second game ⠀⠀which has not yet been deciphered.

SPECULATION OF IT’S PURPOSE_________________________

Derek J. de Solla Price suggested that it might have been on public display, possibly in a museum or public hall in Rhodes. The island was known for its displays of mechanical engineering, particularly automata, which apparently were a speciality of the Rhodians. Pindar, one of the nine lyric poets of ancient Greece, said this of Rhodes in his seventh Olympic Ode:

⠀⠀The animated figures stand
⠀⠀Adorning every public street
⠀⠀And seem to breathe in stone, or
⠀⠀Move their marble feet.

Arguments against it being on public display include:

1.  The device is rather small, indicating that the designer was aiming for  ⠀⠀compactness and, as a result, the size of the front and back dials is unsuitable ⠀⠀for public display. A simple comparison with the size of the Tower of the Winds ⠀⠀in Athens would suggest that the Antikythera mechanism manufacturer ⠀designed  the device for mobility rather than public display in a fixed location.

2.  The mechanism had door plates that contained at least 2,000 characters, ⠀⠀forming what members of the Antikythera mechanism research project often ⠀⠀refer to as an instruction manual. The attachment of this manual to the ⠀⠀mechanism itself implies ease of transport and personal use.

3.  The existence of this “instruction manual” implies that the device was ⠀⠀constructed by a scientist and mechanic for use by a non-expert traveler (the ⠀⠀text has a lot of information associated with well known Mediterranean ⠀⠀geographical locations).

The device is unlikely to have been intended for navigation use because:

1.  Some data, such as eclipse predictions, are unnecessary for navigation.
2.  Damp, salt-laden marine environments would quickly corrode the gears,  ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀rendering it useless.

On 31 July 2008, scientists reported new findings in the journal Nature showing that the mechanism tracked the Metonic calendar, predicted solar eclipses, and calculated the timing of the Ancient Olympic Games.  Inscriptions on the instrument closely match the names of the months on calendars from Illyria and Epirus in northwestern Greece and with the island of Corfu.

SIMILAR DEVICES IN ANCIENT LITERATURE_____________

Cicero’s De re publica, a 1st century BC philosophical dialogue, mentions two machines that some modern authors consider as some kind of planetarium or orrery, predicting the movements of the Sun, the Moon, and the five planets known at that time. They were both built by Archimedes and brought to Rome by the Roman general Marcus Claudius Marcellus after the death of Archimedes at the siege of Syracuse in 212 BC. Marcellus had great respect for Archimedes and one of these machines was the only item he kept from the siege (the second was offered to the temple of Virtus).   The device was kept as a family heirloom, and Cicero has Philus (one of the participants in a conversation that Cicero imagined had taken place in a villa belonging to Scipio Aemilianus in the year 129 BC) saying that Caius Sulpicius Gallus (consul with Marcellus’ nephew in 166 BC, and credited by Pliny the Elder as the first Roman to have written a book explaining solar and lunar eclipses) gave a “learned explanation” of it and demonstrated it working.

⠀⠀I had often heard this celestial globe or sphere mentioned on account of the ⠀⠀great fame of Archimedes. Its appearance, however, did not seem to me ⠀⠀particularly striking. There is another, more elegant in form, and more ⠀⠀generally known, moulded by the same Archimedes, and deposited by the same ⠀⠀Marcellus, in the Temple of Virtue at Rome. But as soon as Gallus had begun ⠀⠀to explain, by his sublime science, the composition of this machine, I felt that ⠀⠀the Sicilian geometrician must have possessed a genius superior to any thing ⠀⠀we usually conceive to belong to our nature. Gallus assured us, that the solid ⠀⠀and compact globe, was a very ancient invention, and that the first model of it ⠀⠀had been presented by Thales of Miletus. That afterwards Eudoxus of Cnidus, ⠀⠀a disciple of Plato, had traced on its surface the stars that appear in the sky, ⠀⠀and that many years subsequent, borrowing from Eudoxus this beautiful ⠀⠀design and representation, Aratus had illustrated them in his verses, not by any ⠀⠀science of astronomy, but the ornament of poetic description. He added, that ⠀⠀the figure of the sphere, which displayed the motions of the Sun and Moon, ⠀⠀and the five planets, or wandering stars, could not be represented by the ⠀⠀primitive solid globe.  And that in this, the invention of Archimedes was  ⠀⠀admirable, because he had calculated how a single revolution should maintain ⠀⠀unequal and diversified progressions in dissimilar motions.

⠀⠀When Gallus moved this globe it showed the relationship of the Moon with the ⠀⠀Sun, and there were exactly the same number of turns on the bronze device as ⠀⠀the number of days in the real globe of the sky. Thus it showed the same eclipse ⠀⠀of the Sun as in the globe [of the sky], as well as showing the Moon entering ⠀⠀the area of the Earth’s shadow when the Sun is in line …

⠀⠀[i.e. It showed both solar and lunar eclipses.]

So at least one of Archimedes’ machines, probably (considering Gallus’ interests and the fact that that portion of the De Republica seems to be concerned with astronomical prodigia and in particular eclipses) quite similar to the Antikythera mechanism, was still operated around 150 BC.

Pappus of Alexandria stated that Archimedes had written a now lost manuscript on the construction of these devices entitled On Sphere-Making.   The surviving texts from the Library of Alexandria describe many of his creations, some even containing simple drawings. One such device is his odometer, the exact model later used by the Romans to place their mile markers (described by Vitruvius, Heron of Alexandria and in the time of Emperor Commodus).  The drawings in the text appeared functional, but attempts to build them as pictured had failed. When the gears pictured, which had square teeth, were replaced with gears of the type in the Antikythera mechanism, which were angled, the device was perfectly functional.  Whether this is an example of a device created by Archimedes and described by texts lost in the burning of the Library of Alexandria, or if it is a device based on his discoveries, or if it has anything to do with him at all, is debatable.

If Cicero’s account is correct, then this technology existed as early as the 3rd century BC. Archimedes’ device is also mentioned by later Roman era writers such as Lactantius (Divinarum Institutionum Libri VII), Claudian (In sphaeram Archimedes), and Proclus (Commentary on the first book of Euclid’s Elements of Geometry) in the 4th and 5th centuries.

Cicero also said that another such device was built ‘recently’ by his friend Posidonius, “… each one of the revolutions of which brings about the same movement in the Sun and Moon and five wandering stars [planets] as is brought about each day and night in the heavens…”

“It is unlikely that any one of these machines was the Antikythera mechanism found in the shipwreck because both the devices fabricated by Archimedes and mentioned by Cicero were located in Rome at least 30 years later than the estimated date of the shipwreck and the third one was almost certainly in the hands of Posidonius by that date. So we know of at least four such devices. The modern scientists who have reconstructed the Antikythera mechanism also agree that it was too sophisticated to have been a unique device.

It is probable that the Antikythera mechanism was not unique, as shown by Cicero’s references to such mechanisms. This adds support to the idea that there was an ancient Greek tradition of complex mechanical technology that was later, at least in part, transmitted to the Byzantine and Islamic worlds, where mechanical devices which were complex, albeit simpler than the Antikythera mechanism, were built during the Middle Ages.[24] Fragments of a geared calendar attached to a sundial, from the 5th or 6th century Byzantine Empire, have been found; the calendar may have been used to assist in telling time.[25] In the Islamic world, Banū Mūsā’s Kitab al-Hiyal, or Book of Ingenious Devices, was commissioned by the Caliph of Baghdad in the early 9th century AD. This text described over a hundred mechanical devices, some of which may date back to ancient Greek texts preserved in monasteries. A geared calendar similar to the Byzantine device was described by the scientist al-Biruni around 1000, and a surviving 13th century astrolabe also contains a similar clockwork device. It is possible that this medieval technology may have been transmitted to Europe and contributed to the development of mechanical clocks there.

INVESTIGATIONS AND RECONSTRUCTIONS_______________

REPLICA MODEL Machine d'Anticythére - Reconstruction of the Antikythera mechanism in the National Archaeological Museum, Athens (made by Robert J. Deroski, based on Derek J. de Solla Price model)

Replica of the Antikythera Instrument: Based on the research of Professor Derek de Solla Price, in collaboration with the National Scientific Research Center “Demokritos” and physicist CH Karakalos who carried out the x-ray tomography of the original. This mechanism has been rebuilt to show the likely operation of the original. Price built a rectangular box of 33 cm X 17 cm X 10 cm with protective plates bearing Greek inscriptions of planets and operational information. The mechanism is a complex set of 32 gears of various sizes, turning at different speeds. The mechanism was offered by Prof. Price to the National Museum in 1980 and remains the reference for the study of the original despite the fact that its construction has been subject to much criticism. National archaeological museum, Athens, number BE 109/1980.

Reconstruction of the Antikythera mechanism in the National Archaeological Museum, Athens (made by Robert J. Deroski, based on Derek J. de Solla Price model)

The Antikythera mechanism is one of the world’s oldest known geared devices. It has puzzled and intrigued historians of science and technology since its discovery. A number of individuals and groups have been instrumental in advancing the knowledge and understanding of the mechanism including: pioneering German Philologist Albert Rehm; Derek J. de Solla Price (with Charalampos Karakalos and his wife Emily); Allan George Bromley (with Frank Percival, Michael Wright and Bernard Gardner); Michael Wright and The Antikythera Mechanism Research Project. ”

Derek J. de Solla Price

Following decades of work cleaning the device, in 1951 British science historian Derek J. de Solla Price undertook systematic investigation of the mechanism.
Price published several papers on “Clockwork before the Clock”. and “On the Origin of Clockwork”, before the first major publication in June 1959 on the mechanism: “An Ancient Greek Computer”. This was the lead article in Scientific American and appears to have been initially published at the prompting of Arthur C. Clarke, according to the book Arthur C. Clarke’s Mysterious World (see end of chapter 3). In “An Ancient Greek Computer” Price advanced the theory that the Antikythera mechanism was a device for calculating the motions of stars and planets, which would make the device the first known analog computer. Until that time, the Antikythera mechanism’s function was largely unknown, though it had been correctly identified as an astronomical device, perhaps being an astrolabe.

In 1971, Price, by then the first Avalon Professor of the History of Science at Yale University, teamed up with Charalampos Karakalos, professor of nuclear physics at the Greek National Centre of Scientific Research “DEMOKRITOS”. Karakalos took both gamma- and X-ray radiographs of the mechanism, which revealed critical information about the device’s interior configuration.

In 1974, Price published “Gears from the Greeks: the Antikythera mechanism — a calendar computer from ca. 80 BC”,[30] where he presented a model of how the mechanism could have functioned.

Price’s model, as presented in his “Gears from the Greeks”, was the first theoretical attempt at reconstructing the device based on its inner structure revealed by the radiographs. According to that model, the front dial shows the annual progress of the Sun and Moon through the zodiac against the Egyptian calendar. The upper rear dial displays a four-year period and has associated dials showing the Metonic cycle of 235 synodic months, which approximately equals 19 solar years. The lower rear dial plots the cycle of a single synodic month, with a secondary dial showing the lunar year of 12 synodic months.

One of the remarkable proposals made by Price was that the mechanism employed differential gears, which enabled the mechanism to add or subtract angular velocities. The differential was used to compute the synodic lunar cycle by subtracting the effects of the Sun’s movement from those of the sidereal lunar movement.

Allan George Bromley

A variant on Price’s reconstruction was built by Australian computer scientist Allan George Bromley of the University of Sydney and Sydney clockmaker Frank Percival. Bromley went on to make new, more accurate X-ray images in collaboration with Michael Wright.

Michael Wright

Michael Wright, formerly Curator of Mechanical Engineering at The London Science Museum and now of Imperial College, London, made a completely new study of the original fragments together with Allan George Bromley.  They used a technique called linear X-ray tomography which was suggested by retired consultant radiologist, Alan Partridge. For this, Wright designed and made an apparatus for linear tomography, allowing the generation of sectional 2D radiographic images.   Early results of this survey were presented in 1997, which showed that Price’s reconstruction was fundamentally flawed.

Further study of the new imagery allowed Wright to advance a number of proposals. Firstly he developed the idea, suggested by Price in “Gears from the Greeks”, that the mechanism could have served as a planetarium. Wright’s planetarium not only modelled the motion of the Sun and Moon, but also the Inferior Planets (Mercury and Venus), and the Superior Planets (Mars, Jupiter and Saturn).
Wright proposed that the Sun and Moon could have moved in accordance with the theories of Hipparchus and the five known planets moved according to the simple epicyclic theory suggested by the theorem of Apollonius. In order to prove that this was possible using the level of technology apparent in the mechanism, Wright produced a working model of such a planetarium.

Wright also increased upon Price’s gear count of 27 to 31 including 1 in Fragment C that was eventually identified as part of a Moon phase display.[37] He suggested that this is a mechanism that shows the phase of the Moon by means of a rotating semi-silvered ball, realized by the differential rotation of the sidereal cycle of the Moon and the Sun’s yearly cycle. This precedes previously known mechanisms of this sort by a millennium and a half.

More accurate tooth counts were also obtained, allowing a new gearing scheme to be advanced.   This more accurate information allowed Wright to confirm Price’s perceptive suggestion that the upper back dial displays the Metonic cycle with 235 lunar months divisions over a five-turn scale. In addition to this Wright proposed the remarkable idea that the main back dials are in the form of spirals, with the upper back dial out as a five-turn spiral containing 47 divisions in each turn. It therefore presented a visual display of the 235 months of the Metonic cycle (19 years ≈ 235 Synodic Months). Wright also observed that fragmentary inscriptions suggested that the pointer on the subsidiary dial showed a count of four cycles of the 19-year period, equal to the 76-year Callippic cycle.

Based on more tentative observations, Wright also came to the conclusion that the lower back dial counted Draconic Months and could perhaps have been used for eclipse prediction.

All these findings have been incorporated into Wright’s working model, demonstrating that a single mechanism with all these functions could be built, and would work.

Despite the improved imagery provided by the linear tomography Wright could not reconcile all the known gears into a single coherent mechanism, and this led him to advance the theory that the mechanism had been altered, with some astronomical functions removed and others added.

Finally, as an outcome of his considerable research, Wright also conclusively demonstrated that Price’s suggestion of the existence of a differential gearing arrangement was incorrect.

In 2006 Wright completed what he believes to be an almost exact replica of the mechanism.

Michael Wright’s research on the mechanism is continuing in parallel with the efforts of the Antikythera Mechanism Research Project (AMRP). Recently Wright slightly modified his model of the mechanism to incorporate the latest findings of the AMRP regarding the function of the pin and slot engaged gears that brilliantly simulate the anomaly in the Moon’s angular velocity. On 6 March 2007 he presented his model in the National Hellenic Research Foundation in Athens.

The Antikythera Mechanism Research Project

The Antikythera mechanism is now being studied by the Antikythera Mechanism Research Project, a joint program between Cardiff University (M. Edmunds, T. Freeth), the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (X. Moussas, Y. Bitsakis), the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (J.H. Seiradakis), the National Archaeological Museum of Athens, X-Tek Systems UK and Hewlett-Packard USA, funded by the Leverhulme Trust and supported by the Cultural Foundation of the National Bank of Greece.

The mechanism’s fragility precluded its removal from the museum, so the Hewlett-Packard research team  and X-Tek Systems had to bring their devices to Greece. HP built a 3-D surface imaging device, known as the “PTM Dome”, that surrounds the object under examination. X-Tek Systems developed a 12 ton 450 kV microfocus computerised tomographer especially for the Antikythera Mechanism.
It was announced in Athens on 21 October 2005 that new pieces of the Antikythera mechanism had been found. There are now 82 fragments. Most of the new pieces had been stabilized but were awaiting conservation.

On 30 May 2006, it was announced that the imaging system had enabled much more of the Greek inscription to be viewed and translated, from about 1,000 characters that were visible previously, to over 2,160 characters, representing about 95% of the extant text. The team’s findings shed new light concerning the function and purpose of the Antikythera mechanism. Research is ongoing. The first results were announced at an international conference in Athens, November 30 and December 1, 2006.

Nature papers 2006 and 2008

On 30 November 2006, the science journal Nature published a new reconstruction of the mechanism by the Antikythera Mechanism Research Project, based on the high resolution X-ray tomography described above.   This work doubled the amount of readable text, corrected prior transcriptions, and provided a new translation. The inscriptions led to a dating of the mechanism to around 150 to 100 BC. It is evident that they contain a manual with an astronomical, mechanical and geographical section.

The new discoveries confirm that the mechanism is an astronomical analog calculator or orrery used to predict the positions of celestial bodies. This work proposes that the mechanism possessed 37 gears, of which 30 survive, and was used for prediction of the position of the Sun and the Moon. Based on the inscriptions, which mention the stationary points of the planets, the authors speculate that planetary motions may also have been indicated.

On the front face were graduations for the solar scale and the zodiac together with pointers that indicated the position of the Sun, the Moon, the lunar phase, and possibly the planetary motions.

On the back, two spiral scales (made of half-circles with two centers) with sliding pointers indicated the state of two further important astronomical cycles: the Saros cycle, the period of approximately 18 years separating the return of the Sun, Moon and Earth to the same relative positions and the more accurate exeligmos cycle of 54 years and one day (essential in eclipse prediction, see Eclipse cycle). It also contains another spiral scale for the Metonic cycle (19 years, equal to 235 lunar months) and the Callippic cycle with a period of 1016 lunar orbits in approximately 76 years.

The Moon mechanism, using an ingenious train of gears, two of them linked with a slightly offset axis and pin in a slot, shows the position and phase of the Moon during the month. The velocity of the Moon varies according to the theory of Hipparchus, and to a good approximation follows Kepler’s second law for the angular velocity, being faster near the perigee and slower at the apogee.

On 31 July 2008, a paper providing further details about the mechanism was published in Nature (Nature Vol 454, Issue 7204, July 31, 2008).[53] In this paper, among other revelations, it is demonstrated that the mechanism also contained a dial divided into four parts, and demonstrated a four-year cycle through four segments of one year each, which is thought to be a means of describing which of the games (such as the ancient Olympics) that took place in two and four-year cycles were to take place in any given year.
The names of the months have been read; they are the months attested for the colonies of Corinth (and therefore also traditionally assumed for Corinth, Kerkyra, Epidamnos, and Syracuse, which have left less direct evidence). The investigators suggest that the device might well be of Syracusan design and so descend from the work of Archimedes; alternatively it could have been ordered by and customized for any of these markets and was being shipped.

Nature published another study on 24 November 2010.   The study interprets the mechanism to be based on computation methods used in Babylonian astronomy, not ancient Greek astronomy, implying that Babylonian astronomy inspired the Greek counterpart – including the mechanical constructs.

Andrew Carol, an Apple software engineer, built a replica of the mechanism out of 1,500 LEGO pieces,  and has correctly predicted theSolar eclipse of April 8, 2024 as a demonstration of its accuracy.

There is also a 3D model simulator of Price’s and the Antikythera Mechanism Research Project representations.

In fiction

The device is mentioned in Kim Stanley Robinson’s novel Galileo’s Dream. on page 293: Cartophilus actually smiled at this. “You may be right. Whatever you call it, there’s one of them on the bottom of the Aegean, near Antikytherae. It’s likely to last a long time, too. It was disguised to look like an Olympic calendar, but that won’t be enough to explain it if it’s ever found

The device is one of a number of “entanglers” which are used for time travel.

104 Comments (+add yours?)

  1. Evy Deey
    Aug 19, 2014 @ 15:28:26

    Thanks a whole lot for revealing this particular train of thought with folks. You obviously know very well, what you are talking about and aren’t just chatting around to get hyped! So Book-marked. I implore you to additionally review site. We could actually have a great conversation between all of us, I would imagine! You’re my fave, with all you’re creating. Love, love, love it very much! This is professionally presented on this area with deal of expertise. Perhaps that is why I want to find out more! Having a wonderful peer into what you bring.

    Reply

  2. Vellusha
    Aug 19, 2014 @ 14:33:27

    Good way of explaining things from this fastidious article to obtain information regarding my presentation topic, which i am going to deliver in university.
    Vellusha Charms

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

%d bloggers like this: